I was
rather disappointed with this book, bearing in mind the author’s reputation as
being one of Japan’s greatest 20th Century writers. I am afraid that I found it
tedious despite the concept of the man trapped in a rather unusual situation.
The
story is that a man has gone missing, with no evidence of anything suspicious.
After seven years the case is closed.
We go
back seven years and follow the man as he sets out for the seaside, complete
with equipment to catch insects. Once he gets there he starts to wander over
the huge dunes which threaten to cover the village which he has found.
At one
point he is suspected of being a government inspector, but he manages to
convince the villagers that he is not. One of them agrees to help him get accommodation
for the night.
Eventually
he is tricked into going into a deep pit in the sand. He finds a dilapidated
house occupied by a single person, a woman whose purpose in life seems to be to
shovel encroaching sand from one side of the pit into buckets at the opposite
side. These are then lifted out by the villagers and disposed of somewhere.
The
woman seems to have the task of saving the village from disappearing. He learns
with horror that he has been enticed into the pit so that he can help the woman
in her task. He discovers the hard way that he will only be fed and watered if
he co-operates.
I liked
the man’s notion of converting the village into spherical homes which could
roll over the sand. The inner, stable, living quarters would rotate in the opposite
mode to the outer, thus staying horizontal. This could be an ideal form of living
for Arrakis, Frank Herbert’s desert planet.
Although
the man is a teacher, he seems to have a totally different idea of teachers
from ours. We value teachers for their work in bringing our young into the
world as fully fledged humans, capable of thinking, reasoning and learning even
if many of them do not take advantage of the opportunities available. His
attitude is more that he is worthless since he, and other teachers are left
behind as the pupils move on to the next year.
In his
musings about how his colleagues might be setting up a police investigation to
find him, we finally (page 81) learn that he is called Nikki Jumpei, and he is
31.
From
page 111 to 113 there is a short section in which Nikki seems to be cogitating
about writing a book about his experiences. Does this mean that he escapes at
some future time?
I
eventually didn’t care as I was getting more and more bored with the whole
thing, though I stuck it out to the bitter end since I wanted to find out.
I could
only give “The woman in the dunes a score of 5.5/10.
<< Home